Estudio observacional de pacientes de una Unidad de Lípidos en tratamiento hipolipemiante para prevención primaria y secundaria: Estudio ULFI / Observational study of patients from a Lipid Unit on lipid-modifying therapy for primary and secondary prevention: ULFI Study

Objetivos: Evaluar la consecución de los objetivos de colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de baja densidad (cLDL) establecidos por las guías europeas de manejo de las dislipemias de 2019 y de prevención cardiovascular de 2021, describir el tratamiento hipolipemiante realizado, analizar el logro de los objetivos según el tratamiento hipolipemiante recibido y estudiar los factores asociados al éxito terapéutico. Diseño: Estudio observacional con 185 pacientes de ambos sexos de 18 años o más en tratamiento hipolipemiante para prevención primaria o secundaria, atendidos en la Unidad de Lípidos. Resultados: El 62,1% de los pacientes presentó un riesgo cardiovascular (RCV) muy alto según la guía de 2019, y el 60,5% según la de 2021. Del total de casos, el 22,7% logró un control adecuado del cLDL según la guía de 2019 y el 20% lo hizo de acuerdo con la de 2021. El 47,6% de los pacientes recibió tratamiento hipolipemiante de muy alta intensidad y el 14,1% lo recibió de extremadamente alta intensidad. El 76% de los sujetos con muy alto RCV en tratamiento hipolipemiante de extremadamente alta intensidad logró los objetivos terapéuticos de ambas guías. En el análisis multivariante, los factores asociados al éxito terapéutico fueron la presencia de enfermedad cardiovascular arteriosclerótica, la intensidad del tratamiento hipolipemiante, la diabetes mellitus y el consumo bajo o moderado de alcohol. Conclusiones: El control de la dislipemia es mejorable. Los tratamientos hipolipemiantes de alta o extremadamente alta intensidad pueden contribuir a optimizar el control de los pacientes con mayor RCV. (AU)

Objectives: To evaluate the achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) goals established by the 2019 European Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemias and 2021 Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Guidelines, describe the lipid-lowering treatment received, analyze the achievement of goals according to the lipid-lowering treatment received and study the factors associated with therapeutic success. Design: Observational study that included 185 patients of both sexes aged 18 or over undergoing lipid-lowering treatment for primary or secondary prevention, attended at the Lipid Unit. Results: 62.1% of the patients had a very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) according to the 2019 guidelines, and 60.5% according to the 2021 guidelines. Of the total cases, 22.7% achieved adequate control of LDLc according to the 2019 guidelines and 20% according to the 2021 guidelines. 47.6% of the patients received very high intensity lipid-lowering treatment, and 14.1% received extremely high intensity lipid-lowering treatment. 76% of subjects with very high CVR on extremely high intensity lipid-lowering treatment achieved the therapeutic objectives of both guides. In the multivariate analysis, factors associated with therapeutic success were the presence of arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease, the intensity of lipid-lowering treatment, diabetes mellitus, and low to moderate alcohol consumption. Conclusions: Dyslipidemia control is improvable. High or extremely high intensity lipid-lowering treatments can contribute to optimizing control of patients with higher CVR. (AU)

Observational study of patients from a Lipid Unit on lipid-modifying therapy for primary and secondary prevention: ULFI Study. / Estudio observacional de pacientes de una Unidad de Lípidos en tratamiento hipolipemiante para prevención primaria y secundaria: Estudio ULFI.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) goals established by the 2019 European Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemias and 2021 Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Guidelines, describe the lipid-lowering treatment received, analyze the achievement of goals according to the lipid-lowering treatment received and study the factors associated with therapeutic success. DESIGN: Observational study that included 185 patients of both sexes aged 18 or over undergoing lipid-lowering treatment for primary or secondary prevention, attended at the Lipid Unit. RESULTS: 62.1% of the patients had a very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) according to the 2019 guidelines, and 60.5% according to the 2021 guidelines. Of the total cases, 22.7% achieved adequate control of LDLc according to the 2019 guidelines and 20% according to the 2021 guidelines. 47.6% of the patients received very high intensity lipid-lowering treatment, and 14.1% received extremely high intensity lipid-lowering treatment. 76% of subjects with very high CVR on extremely high intensity lipid-lowering treatment achieved the therapeutic objectives of both guides. In the multivariate analysis, factors associated with therapeutic success were the presence of arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease, the intensity of lipid-lowering treatment, diabetes mellitus, and low to moderate alcohol consumption. CONCLUSIONS: Dyslipidemia control is improvable. High or extremely high intensity lipid-lowering treatments can contribute to optimizing control of patients with higher CVR.

SmartLab 2.0 en prevención cardiovascular de dislipemia aterogénica / SmartLab 2.0 in cardiovascular prevention of atherogenic dyslipidemia

Objetivo: Implementación en el sistema informático de laboratorio (SIL) de un algoritmo bioquímico automatizado para la identificación en analíticas de rutina de pacientes con dislipemia aterogénica y derivación prioritaria a la unidad de día de diabetes. Material y métodos: Se diseñó en el SIL el algoritmo: HBA1c>9,3 +TG>150mg/dl +cHDL <40mg/dl +LDL/ApoB es<1,3. Se inserta un comentario alertando al médico peticionario del diagnóstico de dislipemia aterogénica y se procede a la derivación prioritaria desde el laboratorio a la unidad de día de diabetes en los casos necesarios. Resultados: En el periodo de un año se han identificado a un total de 899 pacientes con HBA1c>7 y criterio de dislipemia aterogénica. De ellos, 203 pacientes procedentes de atención primaria con HbA1c>9,3 se derivaron al hospital de día de diabetes. Conclusiones: El refuerzo de la prevención cardiovascular es necesario a todos los niveles. El laboratorio clínico debe jugar un papel fundamental en el diagnóstico de las dislipemias. La detección temprana de los pacientes con alto riesgo cardiovascular es primordial y la colaboración entre las distintas unidades clínicas es fundamental para garantizar la seguridad del paciente.(AU)

Introduction: SmartLab 2.0 is an innovative concept of multidisciplinary collaboration between the clinical laboratory and the diabetes day unit that was born with the aim of identifying patients at high cardiovascular risk who require priority attention, such as patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia, in order to create a cardiovascular prevention strategy. Objective: Implementation in the Laboratory Information System (LIS) of an automated biochemical algorithm for the identification of patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia in routine analyses and priority referral to the diabetes day unit. Material and methods: The algorithm designed in the SIL was: HBA1c>9.3 +TG>150mg/dl +HDLc<40mg/dl +LDL/ApoB<1.3. A comment was inserted alerting the requesting physician of the diagnosis of atherogenic dyslipidemia and priority referral was made from the laboratory to the diabetes day unit in the necessary cases. Results: In the 1-year period, a total of 899 patients with HBA1c>7 and atherogenic dyslipidemia criteria were identified. Of these, 203 patients from primary care with HbA1c>9.3 were referred to the diabetes day hospital. Conclusions: Reinforcement of cardiovascular prevention is necessary at all levels. The clinical laboratory should play a fundamental role in the diagnosis of dyslipidemias. Early detection of patients at high cardiovascular risk is essential and collaboration between the different clinical units is fundamental to guarantee patient safety.(AU)

SmartLab 2.0 in cardiovascular prevention of atherogenic dyslipidemia. / SmartLab 2.0 en prevención cardiovascular de dislipemia aterogénica.

INTRODUCTION: SmartLab 2.0 is an innovative concept of multidisciplinary collaboration between the clinical laboratory and the diabetes day unit that was born with the aim of identifying patients at high cardiovascular risk who require priority attention, such as patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia, in order to create a cardiovascular prevention strategy. OBJECTIVE: Implementation in the Laboratory Information System (LIS) of an automated biochemical algorithm for the identification of patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia in routine analyses and priority referral to the diabetes day unit. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The algorithm designed in the SIL was: HBA1c>9.3 +TG>150mg/dl +HDLc<40mg/dl +LDL/ApoB<1.3. A comment was inserted alerting the requesting physician of the diagnosis of atherogenic dyslipidemia and priority referral was made from the laboratory to the diabetes day unit in the necessary cases. RESULTS: In the 1-year period, a total of 899 patients with HBA1c>7 and atherogenic dyslipidemia criteria were identified. Of these, 203 patients from primary care with HbA1c>9.3 were referred to the diabetes day hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Reinforcement of cardiovascular prevention is necessary at all levels. The clinical laboratory should play a fundamental role in the diagnosis of dyslipidemias. Early detection of patients at high cardiovascular risk is essential and collaboration between the different clinical units is fundamental to guarantee patient safety.

Cuadruple meta en mSalud parala mejora del control de factores de riesgo cardiovascular en población de muy alto riesgo / Quadruple aim in mHealth project to improve the control of cardiovascular risk factors in a very high-risk population

FUNDAMENTOS: El control de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular (FRCV) en la población de alto riesgo continúa siendo subóptimo, lo cual debe hacernos reconsiderar las estrategias preventivas actuales. El objetivo del estudio fue transformar el modelo de prevención cardiovascular secundaria del Hospital Universitario de Torrejón (Madrid, España), para hacerlo más proactivo, preventivo, productivo y eficiente. MÉTODOS: Bajo la perspectiva de cuádruple meta se presenta un proyecto de mSalud en el que el paciente incluirá y revisará periódicamente los parámetros y valores relativos a sus principales FRCV (tabaquismo, dieta, actividad física, peso, tensión arterial, LDL colesterol y hemoglobina glicosilada), pudiendo así comprobar si alcanza los objetivos terapéuticos recomendados en las guías de práctica clínica, interaccionando con su médico y generando avisos para reforzar sus indicaciones y/o intensificar la medidas terapéuticas y farmacológicas en caso de incumplimiento. RESULTADOS: Se realizará una evaluación detallada de la consecución de las cuatro metas buscadas. Se valorarán, las mejoras en el control del riesgo cardiovascular, la experiencia en la atención, el gasto sanitario y la satisfacción de los profesionales sanitarios. CONCLUSIONES: El mSalud brinda nuevas oportunidades para mejorar el control de los FRCV en los pacientes de mayor riesgo. Este logro puede reducir la elevada morbimortalidad cardiovascular de esta población, contribuyendo a reducir los crecientes gastos sanitarios derivados de la misma y a mejorar así la experiencia y adherencia del paciente a las estrategias de prevención secundaria.(AU)

BACKGROUND: The control of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in high-risk population is still suboptimal. This fact should make us reconsider current preventive strategies. The objective of this study was to transform the secondary cardiovascular prevention program of the University Hospital of Torrejon (Madrid, Spain), to make it more proactive, preventive, productive and efficient. METHODS // Within the quadruple aim perspective, we present a mHealth project where the patient will include, and periodically review, the parameters and values related to the main CV risk factors (smoking, diet, physical activity, weight, blood pressure, LDL cholesterol and glycosylated hemoglobin), allowing to check if therapeutic objectives recommended in the clinical practice guidelines are achieved, facilitating doctor-patient communication, and generating warnings to reinforce indications and/or intensify the therapeutic and pharmacological measures in case of non-complianc. RESULTS: A detailed evaluation of the achievement of quadruple aim goals will be performed. Improvements in CV risk control,experience in care, health spending and the healthcare professionals’ satisfaction will be assessed.CONCLUSIONS // mHealth offers new opportunities to improve the control of CV risk factors in high-risk patients. Better controlmight reduce the high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of this population, helping to reduce health spending and improvingthe patients’ experience and adherence to secondary prevention strategies.(AU)

Estándares SEA 2022 para el control global del riesgo cardiovascular / SEA 2022 Standards for Global Control of Cardiovascular Risk

La Sociedad Española de Arteriosclerosis tiene entre sus objetivos contribuir al mayor y mejor conocimiento de la enfermedad vascular, su prevención y su tratamiento. Es de sobra conocido que las enfermedades cardiovasculares son la primera causa de muerte en nuestro país y conllevan además un elevado grado de discapacidad y gasto sanitario. La arteriosclerosis es una enfermedad de causa multifactorial y es por ello que su prevención exige un abordaje global que contemple los distintos factores de riesgo con los que se asocia. Así, este documento resume el nivel actual de conocimientos e incluye recomendaciones y procedimientos a seguir ante el paciente que presenta enfermedad cardiovascular establecida o se encuentra con elevado riesgo vascular. En concreto, este documento revisa los principales síntomas y signos a evaluar durante la visita clínica, los procedimientos de laboratorio y de imagen a solicitar de forma rutinaria o aquellos en situaciones especiales. Igualmente, incluye la estimación del riesgo vascular, los criterios diagnósticos de las distintas entidades que son factores de riesgo cardiovascular, plantea recomendaciones generales y específicas para el tratamiento de los distintos factores de riesgo cardiovascular y sus objetivos finales. Por último, el documento recoge aspectos habitualmente poco referenciados en la literatura como son la organización de una consulta de riesgo vascular. (AU)

One of the objectives of the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis is to contribute to better knowledge of vascular disease, its prevention and treatment. It is well known that cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in our country and entail a high degree of disability and health care costs. Arteriosclerosis is a multifactorial disease and therefore its prevention requires a global approach that takes into account the different risk factors with which it is associated. Therefore, this document summarizes the current level of knowledge and includes recommendations and procedures to be followed in patients with established cardiovascular disease or at high vascular risk. Specifically, this document reviews the main symptoms and signs to be evaluated during the clinical visit, the laboratory and imaging procedures to be routinely requested or requested for those in special situations. It also includes vascular risk estimation, the diagnostic criteria of the different entities that are cardiovascular risk factors, and makes general and specific recommendations for the treatment of the different cardiovascular risk factors and their final objectives. Finally, the document includes aspects that are not usually referenced in the literature, such as the organization of a vascular risk consultation. (AU)

Ecografía de los troncos supraaórticos / Ultrasonography of supra-aortic trunks

La ecografía es un recurso del que disponemos de primera mano los médicos de familia y al que cada vez más frecuentemente recurrimos, hasta el punto de formar ya parte de nuestra exploración física. Es una técnica diagnóstica de fácil acceso, asequible, versátil y no invasiva que emplea los ultrasonidos para definir las estructuras anatómicas de nuestro cuerpo sin necesidad de radiación y que se realiza en tiempo real, pudiendo permitir una exploración dinámica. Pese a todo lo mencionado, la ecografía vascular y, en concreto, la de los troncos supraaórticos no está tan extendida en nuestro ámbito, pese a su importante papel en el ámbito de la prevención cardiovascular, fundamental en la atención primaria. Por este motivo en este artículo se pretende llevar a cabo una breve y clara descripción de la técnica con el objetivo de extender su uso en la práctica cotidiana (AU)

Ultrasound is a resource that family doctors have first-hand and that we use more and more frequently, to the point of becoming part of our physical examination. It is an easily accessible, affordable, versatile and non-invasive diagnostic technique that uses ultrasound to define the anatomical structures of our body without radiation and is performed in real time, allowing a dynamic exploration. Despite all the above, vascular ultrasound and, specifically, the supra-aortic trunks ultrasound is not as widespread in our setting, despite its important role in the field of cardiovascular prevention, which is essential in primary care. For this reason, this article aims to carry out a brief-and-clear description of the technique with the aim of extending its use in daily practice (AU)

Manejo de perfiles de pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo2 en la práctica clínica de la atención primaria en España: Programa CONTROVERTI2 / Management of patient profiles with type2 diabetes mellitus in Primary Care in Spain: CONTROVERTI2 Program

Objetivo: Identificar controversias existentes en el manejo habitual de los pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo2 (DM2) y contrastarlas con la última evidencia científica y guías clínicas, con el fin de optimizar y homogeneizar el tratamiento de los pacientes con DM2 en la atención primaria (AP) en España. Material y métodos: 240 médicos de familia respondieron a un cuestionario online sobre el manejo de 6 perfiles de pacientes con DM2 de complejidad creciente. Resultados: Los factores clínicos más influyentes en la elección del tratamiento antihiperglucémico son una HbA1c >10% y la presencia de enfermedad cardiovascular (ECV), aunque en el paciente evolucionado cobran más relevancia la tasa de filtrado glomerular estimada y el riesgo de hipoglucemia. En el paciente recién diagnosticado con HbA1c>9% se sigue iniciando el tratamiento con monoterapia (24%). En el paciente no controlado con metformina suelen añadirse inhibidores de la dipeptidil peptidasa4 (iDPP4, 54%) seguido de inhibidores del cotransportador sodio-glucosa tipo2 (iSGLT2, 39%). Los agonistas del receptor del péptido similar al glucagón tipo1 (arGLP1) se asocian principalmente al paciente con DM2 obeso. En el paciente no controlado con metformina+sulfonilurea (SU) se prefiere sustituir la SU a añadir un tercer agente antihiperglucémico al tratamiento (77% vs. 23%). Conclusiones: Todavía persiste en AP un enfoque del tratamiento de la DM2 centrado en la reducción de la HbA1c y en la seguridad de los tratamientos. Por ello, los iDPP4 son fármacos ampliamente utilizados. Los iSGLT2 se reservan habitualmente para pacientes con DM2 y ECV y los arGLP1 para pacientes con DM2 obesos, siendo su uso muy limitado (AU)

Aim: To identify existing controversies in the routine management of patients with T2D and to contrast them with the latest scientific evidence and clinical guidelines, in order to help optimize and homogenize the treatment of patients with T2D in Primary Care (PC) in Spain. Material and methods: 240 family doctors responded to an online questionnaire about the management of 6 patient profiles with T2D of increasing complexity. Results: The main drivers for the antihyperglycemic treatment choice are an HbA1c>10% and the presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), although in evolved patients, the estimated glomerular filtration rate and the risk of hypoglycemia become more relevant. In newly diagnosed patients with an HbA1c>9%, treatment is still initiated with monotherapy (24%). In patients not controlled with metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4-I, 54%) or sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-I, 39%) are usually added. On the other hand, type1 glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) are mainly associated with obese patients with T2D. In patients not controlled with metformin+sulfonylurea (SU), SU replacement is preferred to adding a third antihyperglycemic agent to background therapy (77% vs. 23%). Conclusions: T2D treatment in PC is still focused on HbA1c reduction and treatment safety. Thus, DPP4-I are widely used. SGLT2-I are usually preferred for patients with T2D and CVD and GLP1-RA for patients with T2D and obesity, although their use in PC is low (AU)

SEA 2022 Standards for Global Control of Cardiovascular Risk. / Estándares SEA 2022 para el control global del riesgo cardiovascular.

One of the objectives of the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis is to contribute to better knowledge of vascular disease, its prevention and treatment. It is well known that cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in our country and entail a high degree of disability and health care costs. Arteriosclerosis is a multifactorial disease and therefore its prevention requires a global approach that takes into account the different risk factors with which it is associated. Therefore, this document summarizes the current level of knowledge and includes recommendations and procedures to be followed in patients with established cardiovascular disease or at high vascular risk. Specifically, this document reviews the main symptoms and signs to be evaluated during the clinical visit, the laboratory and imaging procedures to be routinely requested or requested for those in special situations. It also includes vascular risk estimation, the diagnostic criteria of the different entities that are cardiovascular risk factors, and makes general and specific recommendations for the treatment of the different cardiovascular risk factors and their final objectives. Finally, the document includes aspects that are not usually referenced in the literature, such as the organization of a vascular risk consultation.

[Management of patient profiles with type2 diabetes mellitus in Primary Care in Spain: CONTROVERTI2 Program]. / Manejo de perfiles de pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo2 en la práctica clínica de la atención primaria en España: Programa CONTROVERTI2.

AIM: To identify existing controversies in the routine management of patients with T2D and to contrast them with the latest scientific evidence and clinical guidelines, in order to help optimize and homogenize the treatment of patients with T2D in Primary Care (PC) in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 240 family doctors responded to an online questionnaire about the management of 6 patient profiles with T2D of increasing complexity. RESULTS: The main drivers for the antihyperglycemic treatment choice are an HbA1c>10% and the presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), although in evolved patients, the estimated glomerular filtration rate and the risk of hypoglycemia become more relevant. In newly diagnosed patients with an HbA1c>9%, treatment is still initiated with monotherapy (24%). In patients not controlled with metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4-I, 54%) or sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-I, 39%) are usually added. On the other hand, type1 glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) are mainly associated with obese patients with T2D. In patients not controlled with metformin+sulfonylurea (SU), SU replacement is preferred to adding a third antihyperglycemic agent to background therapy (77% vs. 23%). CONCLUSIONS: T2D treatment in PC is still focused on HbA1c reduction and treatment safety. Thus, DPP4-I are widely used. SGLT2-I are usually preferred for patients with T2D and CVD and GLP1-RA for patients with T2D and obesity, although their use in PC is low.

[Ultrasonography of supra-aortic trunks]. / Ecografía de los troncos supraaórticos.

Ultrasound is a resource that family doctors have first-hand and that we use more and more frequently, to the point of becoming part of our physical examination. It is an easily accessible, affordable, versatile and non-invasive diagnostic technique that uses ultrasound to define the anatomical structures of our body without radiation and is performed in real time, allowing a dynamic exploration. Despite all the above, vascular ultrasound and, specifically, the supra-aortic trunks ultrasound is not as widespread in our setting, despite its important role in the field of cardiovascular prevention, which is essential in primary care. For this reason, this article aims to carry out a brief-and-clear description of the technique with the aim of extending its use in daily practice.

Utilización de un dispositivo móvil de tecnología electrónica para tamizaje de fibrilación auricular: estudio piloto / Use of a mobile electronic technology device for atrial fibrillation screening: pilot study / Uso de dispositivo de tecnologia eletrônica móvel para rastreamento de fibrilação atrial: estudo piloto

La fibrilación auricular (FA) es un problema de salud pública que genera mortalidad y morbilidad, con su mayor impacto en mayores de 65 años. Su detección es especialmente relevante para la población de riesgo. Este estudio piloto propone valorar la utilidad de un dispositivo móvil de tecnología electrónica (DMTE) para el tamizaje de FA. Objetivo primario: evaluar la validez y confiabilidad de un DMTE para identificar FA. Objetivo secundario: validar los procesos de recolección, transmisión, almacenamiento, procesamiento e interpretación de los datos obtenidos. Método: los asistentes a 5 talleres del Plan Ibirapitá (entre el 15 de octubre y el 30 de noviembre de 2018) fueron invitados a participar del estudio. Se utilizó un DMTE (sensor KardiaMobile de AliveCor®) cuyo registro se contrastó con el trazado del ECG de 12 derivaciones realizado en forma casi simultánea. Se compararon los diagnósticos automáticos con los realizados por dos cardiólogos expertos de forma independiente, a partir de la lectura del registro realizado con el DMTE y de un ECG de 12 derivaciones. Resultados: participaron del estudio 114 beneficiarios del Plan Ibirapitá, 78 del sexo femenino. La edad fue de 72,5 ± 5,36 años (rango: 53-87 años). La sensibilidad para el diagnóstico de FA del DMTE fue de 100%, con una especificidad de 96,6%. (VPP = 57,1% VPN = 100%) y una proporción de diagnóstico correcto de 96,8%. El DMTE catalogó como "sin clasificar" al 18,4% de los trazados. Considerando esto, la proporción de diagnóstico correcto disminuyó a 78,9%, sin presentar falsos negativos. Conclusiones: el cribado de FA con la utilización de un DMTE en una población de adultos mayores es factible y confiable. El hallazgo de un 18,4% de trazados con diagnóstico automático "sin clasificar" hace necesario contar con recursos humanos calificados para realizar la confirmación diagnóstica en esos registros.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a public health problem generating important morbidity and mortality mainly in > 65 years old population. Detection is key in the population at risk. This pilot study was designed to assess a mobile electronic technology device (METD) usefulness in AF screening. Objective: evaluate validity and reliability of a METD in AF identification. Secondary objective: to validate the process of collection, transmission, storage, method and interpretation of obtained data. Method: participants in 5 Ibirapitá Plan workshops (October 15-November 30, 2018) were invited to participate in the study. A KardiaMobile Alive Cor® METD was used, whose ECG recording was compared with a 12L ECG taken almost at the same time. Automatic METD report was compared with 2 independent cardiologists report considering the METD recording and the 12L ECG. Results: 114 participants (78 female), mean age 72,5 y.o. (SD 5,36; range 53-87) were included. METD sensitivity for AF diagnosis was 100% with a 96.6% specificity (PPV=57,1% NPV=100%), and a 96.8% number of correct diagnosis. A 18.4% of recordings were catalogued as "unclassified" by the METD. Considering this, the proportion of correct diagnosis decreased to 78.9%; there were not false negatives. Conclusions: AF screening with a METD in an older population is feasible and reliable. The finding of 18.4% METD recordings as "unclassified" raises the needs for experts review during diagnosis confirmation.

A fibrilação atrial (FA) é um problema de saúde pública que gera mortalidade e morbidade, com maior impacto em pessoas com mais de 65 anos. Sua detecção é especialmente relevante para a população de risco. Este estudo piloto teve como objetivo avaliar a utilidade de um dispositivo móvel de tecnologia eletrônica (DMTE) para o monitoramento da FA. Objetivo principal: avaliar a validade e confiabilidade de um DMTE para identificar FA. Objetivo secundário: validar os processos de coleta, transmissão, armazenamento, processamento e interpretação dos dados obtidos. Método: participantes de 5 oficinas do Plano Ibirapitá (entre 15 de outubro e 30 de novembro de 2018) foram convidados a participar do estudo. Foi utilizado um DMTE (sensor AliveCor® KardiaMobile), cujo registro foi contrastado com o traçado do ECG de 12 derivações realizado quase simultaneamente. Os diagnósticos automatizados foram comparados com aqueles realizados por dois cardiologistas especialistas independentes, com base na leitura gráfica do DMTE e no ECG de 12 derivações. Resultados: participaram do estudo 114 beneficiários do Plano Ibirapitá, sendo 78 mulheres. A média de idade foi de 72,5 anos (DP 5,36; variação de 53-87 anos). A sensibilidade para o diagnóstico de FA no DMTE foi de 100% com especificidade de 96,6%. (VPP = 57,1% VPN = 100%) e proporção de diagnóstico correto de 96,8%. O DMTE definiu 18,4% dos registros como "não classificados". Portanto, a proporção de diagnósticos corretos diminuiu para 78,9% e não houve falsos negativos. Conclusões: a triagem para FA por meio de DMTE em uma população idosa é viável e confiável. A constatação de 18,4% dos registros com diagnóstico automático "não classificado" torna necessária a existência de recursos humanos qualificados para a realização da confirmação diagnóstica.

Impacto de la vacunación antigripal sobre la enfermedad cardiovascular / The impact of influenza vaccination on cardiovascular disease

La gripe se ha identificado como un factor desencadenante o agravante de los eventos cardiovasculares. Con el objetivo analizar el efecto de la vacunación antigripal en la enfermedad cardiovascular se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de estudios publicados entre 2009 y 2019. Se consideraron todos los trabajos que evaluaron el efecto de la vacunación frente a la gripe sobre eventos cardiovasculares y su evolución. Finalmente se incluyeron 30 de los 1.147 estudios identificados. Estos trabajos ponen de manifiesto el efecto protector de la vacuna antigripal tanto en el desarrollo de eventos cardiovasculares (infarto de miocardio, ictus, fibrilación auricular e insuficiencia cardíaca) como en el empeoramiento de estos procesos. Además, se demuestra que los pacientes vacunados presentan un menor riesgo de muerte por enfermedades cardiovasculares. La vacunación antigripal es, pues, una medida efectiva en la prevención de enfermedades cardiovasculares tanto en personas con enfermedad cardiovascular establecida como en aquellas sin patología previa. (AU)

Influenza infection has been identified as a triggering or exacerbating factor for cardiovascular events. To analyse the effect of influenza vaccination on cardiovascular disease, a systematic search of studies published between 2009-2019 was conducted. All the studies that evaluated the effect of vaccination against influenza on cardiovascular events and their outcome were considered. Finally, 30 of the 1147 identified studies were included. These studies show a protective effect of the influenza vaccine on the development of cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accidents, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure) and on the worsening of these conditions. Furthermore, the data showed that vaccinated patients have a lower risk of death from cardiovascular pathologies. Influenza vaccination is therefore an effective measure in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases both in patients with established cardiovascular disease and in the population without previous coronary pathology. (AU)

Therapeutic targets in the treatment of dyslipidaemias: From statins to PCSK9 inhibitors. Unmet needs. / Dianas terapéuticas en el tratamiento de las dislipemias: de las estatinas a los inhibidores de PCSK9. Necesidades no cubiertas.

The use of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc)-lowering medications has led to a significant reduction of cardiovascular risk in both primary and secondary prevention. Statins represent the cornerstone of lipid-lowering treatment and substantially decreases cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, there are still unmet clinical needs in the management of dyslipidaemia. Indeed, it is difficult to achieve LDLc targets in many patients, particularly in those at high/very high cardiovascular risk and in those with very high baseline LDLc concentrations. Moreover, a considerable proportion of patients are unable to tolerate maximum statin doses, mostly due to muscle-related adverse effects. In the present narrative review, a summary is presented on the current knowledge on the effects of the different cholesterol-lowering drugs, including those recently approved by European and American regulatory agencies, on lipid profile, and on cardiovascular risk. Since difficult-to-treat patients may benefit from new combination therapies as a result of the emergence of new drugs with clinical evidence, updates of the clinical guidelines would be recommended.

Relationship beetween Primary and Hospital Care in cardiovascular prevention and treatment of dyslipidemias. Derivation algorithm. Discharge criteria. / Relación entre Atención Primaria y Hospitalaria en la prevención cardiovascular y tratamiento de las dislipidemias. Algoritmo de derivación. Criterios de alta.

Effective cardiovascular prevention requires taking advantage of all opportunities for patient contact with the Health Services in order to detect risk factors (CVRF) and global cardiovascular risk stratification (CVR). This particularly involves the Primary Care (PC) services, which must be coordinated with the Hospital Care (HC) in order to make all health resources available to the population. In addition, it is necessary to take into account the contribution of Occupational Health and Pharmacy services. There are hopeful signs as regards the possibility of overcoming the barriers that limit the necessary exchange of information between PC and HC professionals, as a basis for adequate coordination between both levels of care. This includes the implementation of referral and discharge algorithms (in this review this means those related to dyslipidaemias) accepted by professionals at both levels, and currently facilitated by the availability of new corporate tools (mobile, email, virtual consultations). The challenge lies in seizing the opportunity they offer to make their implementation effective.

The impact of influenza vaccination on cardiovascular disease. / Impacto de la vacunación antigripal sobre la enfermedad cardiovascular.

Influenza infection has been identified as a triggering or exacerbating factor for cardiovascular events. To analyse the effect of influenza vaccination on cardiovascular disease, a systematic search of studies published between 2009-2019 was conducted. All the studies that evaluated the effect of vaccination against influenza on cardiovascular events and their outcome were considered. Finally, 30 of the 1147 identified studies were included. These studies show a protective effect of the influenza vaccine on the development of cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accidents, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure) and on the worsening of these conditions. Furthermore, the data showed that vaccinated patients have a lower risk of death from cardiovascular pathologies. Influenza vaccination is therefore an effective measure in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases both in patients with established cardiovascular disease and in the population without previous coronary pathology.

Cardiología digital (e-Cardiología): herramientas de utilidad para el diagnóstico y el manejo del paciente con fibrilación auricular / Digital Cardiology (e-Cardiology): useful tools for diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation / Cardiologia digital (e-Cardiologia): ferramentas úteis para o diagnóstico e tratamiento de pacientes com fibrilação atrial

La tecnología digital móvil (mSalud), recurso aún subutilizado, tiene el potencial para transformarse en un auxiliar imprescindible en la práctica clínica, en particular en Cardiología. La fibrilación auricular es la arritmia más frecuente, cuya prevalencia aumenta con la edad y tiene como complicación más temida el accidente cerebrovascular. Su prevención depende de un diagnóstico oportuno, una adecuada estratificación de riesgo y el uso de anticoagulantes orales. Sin embargo, es con frecuencia paroxística y asintomática, lo que dificulta su diagnóstico. El aporte de la tecnología mediante el desarrollo de aplicaciones para celulares, relojes, dispositivos portátiles o implantables que registran el ritmo cardíaco y permiten el monitoreo prolongado, ambulatorio y a distancia facilitan su detección. Se repasan las principales evidencias que justifican la aplicación de estas estrategias de tamizaje, cuando está indicado realizarlo, cómo y a quiénes hacerlo. Por último, se plantea también la utilidad de estas estrategias de monitoreo prolongado en el manejo y la prevención de la fibrilación auricular.

The mobile digital technology (mHealth), a tool still underutilized, has the potential to become an essential aid in clinical practice, particularly in Cardiology. Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent arrhythmia whose prevalence increases with age and its most feared complication is cerebrovascular accident. Its prevention depends on a timely diagnosis, an adequate risk stratification and the use of oral anticoagulants. However, it is frequently paroxysmal and asymptomatic, which makes its diagnosis difficult. The contribution of technology through the development of applications for cell phones, watches, portable or implantable devices that record the heart rhythm and allow prolonged, outpatient and remote monitoring, facilitate its detection. The main evidences that justify the application of these screening strategies are reviewed, when it is indicated to perform it, how and to whom to do it. Finally, the usefulness of these prolonged monitoring strategies in the management and prevention of atrial fibrillation is also considered.

A utilização da tecnologia digital móvel (m-Saúde), ainda pouco utilizada, tem potencial para se tornar um auxílio essencial na prática clínica, principalmente na Cardiologia. A fibrilação atrial é a arritmia mais frequente, cuja prevalência aumenta com a idade e sua complicação mais temida é o acidente vascular cerebral. Sua prevenção depende de um diagnóstico oportuno, de uma estratificação de risco adequada e do uso de anticoagulantes orais. Porém, freqüentemente é paroxística e assintomática, o que dificulta seu diagnóstico. A contribuição da tecnologia por meio do desenvolvimento de aplicativos para telefones celulares, relógios, dispositivos portáteis ou implantáveis ​​que registram o ritmo cardíaco e permitem monitoramento prolongado, ambulatorial e remoto, facilitam sua detecção. São revisadas as principais evidências que justificam a aplicação dessas estratégias de rastreamento, quando é indicado fazê-lo, como e para quem fazê-lo. Finalmente, a utilidade dessas estratégias de monitoramento prolongado no manejo e prevenção da fibrilação atrial também é considerada.

Prevención primaria y primordial de enfermedad cardiovascular del adulto: cómo actuar desde la niñez: puesta al día / Primary and primordial prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: how to act from childhood: update

La enfermedad cardiovascular (ECV) es la principal causa de muerte en el mundo. Existe evidencia que demuestra que la enfermedad ateroesclerótica, génesis de la ECV, se inicia a edades tempranas de la vida. La presencia y el desarrollo de esta se puede relacionar con los mismos factores de riesgo presentes en adultos (hipertensión arterial, dislipidemias, obesidad, diabetes mellitus y síndrome metabólico). Distintos factores de riesgo conductuales modificables aumentan la posibilidad de desarrollar ECV en edad adulta. Debido a la dificultad de lograr cambios sostenidos y efectivos en adultos se debe actuar desde la niñez enseñando estilos de vida saludables junto con la detección precoz de factores de riesgo para ECV en edad pediátrica. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue revisar la bibliografía actual sobre prevención de enfermedad cardiovascular del adulto desde la niñez, realizando una actualización sobre cuáles son los factores de riesgo de ECV presentes en niños y adolescentes, así como también entregar estrategias de prevención primordial y primaria.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the world. There is evidence that shows that atherosclerotic disease, the genesis of CVD, begins early in life. The presence and development of this is related to the same risk factors present in adults (arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome). Various modifiable behavioral risk factors suffered the possibility of developing CVD in adulthood. Due to the difficulty of achieving sustained and effective changes in adults, action should be taken from childhood, teaching healthy lifestyles along with the early detection of risk factors for CVD in pediatric age. The objective of the present work was to review the current bibliography on prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults from childhood, making an update on outputs are the risk factors for CVD present in children and adolescents, as well as to provide primary and primary prevention strategies.

Aspirin in primary prevention. Meta-analysis stratified by baseline cardiovascular risk.

Introducción: La utilidad de la aspirina en la prevención primaria es todavía objeto de controversia. Los avances médicos y la variabilidad del riesgo cardiovascular podrían explicar la heterogeneidad de los estudios publicados, y las poblaciones de alto riesgo tendrían mayor beneficio. Objetivo: Analizar los efectos de la aspirina en pacientes sin antecedentes cardiovasculares y evaluar los resultados de acuerdo con el riesgo cardiovascular de las poblaciones. Métodos: Se incluyeron estudios que evaluaron el uso de la aspirina en comparación con placebo en la prevención primaria. Se analizó la combinación de muerte cardiovascular, infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM) y accidente cerebrovascular (ACV) isquémico. El punto final de seguridad fue la combinación de ACV hemorrágico y sangrado mayor. Se clasificaron los estudios en riesgo bajo y moderado/ alto, de acuerdo con el número de episodios en la rama de placebo. Resultados: Se evaluaron 13 estudios (n = 164,225), ocho de riesgo cardiovascular bajo (n = 118,455) y cinco de moderado/alto (n = 45,770). Se observó una reducción del punto final combinado en el grupo de aspirina (OR 0.90; IC 95%, 0.85-0.94), sin diferencias en mortalidad cardiovascular (OR 0.94; IC 95%, 0.86-1.04). No se identificaron diferencias entre los subgrupos de riesgo. Se reconocieron mayores complicaciones hemorrágicas en el grupo de aspirina (OR 1.45; IC 95%, 1.32-1.60), sin diferencias entre los subgrupos de riesgo. Conclusión: La aspirina se relacionó con una leve disminución de IAM y ACV isquémico en términos absolutos, sin diferencias en la mortalidad cardiovascular. Esto, junto con el aumento de las complicaciones hemorrágicas, se traduce en una ausencia de beneficio clínico neto. El riesgo cardiovascular basal de la población no modificó los resultados. Background: The usefulness of aspirin in primary prevention continues to be the subject of debate. Medical advances and the variability of cardiovascular risk could explain the heterogeneity of the published studies. High risk populations would have greater benefit. Objective: Analyzing the effects of aspirin in patients without cardiovascular disease and evaluating the results according to the cardiovascular risk of the populations. Methods: Studies evaluating aspirin versus placebo in primary prevention were included. The primary endpoint was the combined cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and ischemic stroke. The final safety point was the combination of hemorrhagic stroke and major bleeding. The studies were classified into low and moderate/high risk, according to the number of events in the placebo arm. Results: Thirteen studies were evaluated (n = 164,225), eight of low cardiovascular risk (n = 118,455) and five of moderate/high risk (n = 45,770). There was a reduction of the combined endpoint in the aspirin group (odds ratio [OR] 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.94), without differences in cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86-1.04). No differences were observed when comparing the risk subgroups. Greater hemorrhagic complications were observed in the aspirin group (OR 1.45; 95% CI, 1.32-1.60), without differences between the risk subgroups. Conclusion: Aspirin was associated with a slight decrease in AMI and ischemic stroke in absolute terms, with no differences in cardiovascular mortality. This accompanied by the increase in hemorrhagic complications, results in an absence of net clinical benefit. The baseline cardiovascular risk of the population did not affect the results.

Aspirina en la prevención primaria. Metaanálisis estratificado por riesgo cardiovascular basal / Aspirin in primary prevention. Meta-analysis stratified by baseline cardiovascular risk

Resumen Introducción: La utilidad de la aspirina en la prevención primaria es todavía objeto de controversia. Los avances médicos y la variabilidad del riesgo cardiovascular podrían explicar la heterogeneidad de los estudios publicados, y las poblaciones de alto riesgo tendrían mayor beneficio. Objetivo: Analizar los efectos de la aspirina en pacientes sin antecedentes cardiovasculares y evaluar los resultados de acuerdo con el riesgo cardiovascular de las poblaciones. Métodos: Se incluyeron estudios que evaluaron el uso de la aspirina en comparación con placebo en la prevención primaria. Se analizó la combinación de muerte cardiovascular, infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM) y accidente cerebrovascular (ACV) isquémico. El punto final de seguridad fue la combinación de ACV hemorrágico y sangrado mayor. Se clasificaron los estudios en riesgo bajo y moderado/ alto, de acuerdo con el número de episodios en la rama de placebo. Resultados: Se evaluaron 13 estudios (n = 164,225), ocho de riesgo cardiovascular bajo (n = 118,455) y cinco de moderado/alto (n = 45,770). Se observó una reducción del punto final combinado en el grupo de aspirina (OR 0.90; IC 95%, 0.85-0.94), sin diferencias en mortalidad cardiovascular (OR 0.94; IC 95%, 0.86-1.04). No se identificaron diferencias entre los subgrupos de riesgo. Se reconocieron mayores complicaciones hemorrágicas en el grupo de aspirina (OR 1.45; IC 95%, 1.32-1.60), sin diferencias entre los subgrupos de riesgo. Conclusión: La aspirina se relacionó con una leve disminución de IAM y ACV isquémico en términos absolutos, sin diferencias en la mortalidad cardiovascular. Esto, junto con el aumento de las complicaciones hemorrágicas, se traduce en una ausencia de beneficio clínico neto. El riesgo cardiovascular basal de la población no modificó los resultados.

Abstract Background: The usefulness of aspirin in primary prevention continues to be the subject of debate. Medical advances and the variability of cardiovascular risk could explain the heterogeneity of the published studies. High risk populations would have greater benefit. Objective: Analyzing the effects of aspirin in patients without cardiovascular disease and evaluating the results according to the cardiovascular risk of the populations. Methods: Studies evaluating aspirin versus placebo in primary prevention were included. The primary endpoint was the combined cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and ischemic stroke. The final safety point was the combination of hemorrhagic stroke and major bleeding. The studies were classified into low and moderate/high risk, according to the number of events in the placebo arm. Results: Thirteen studies were evaluated (n = 164,225), eight of low cardiovascular risk (n = 118,455) and five of moderate/high risk (n = 45,770). There was a reduction of the combined endpoint in the aspirin group (odds ratio [OR] 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.94), without differences in cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86-1.04). No differences were observed when comparing the risk subgroups. Greater hemorrhagic complications were observed in the aspirin group (OR 1.45; 95% CI, 1.32-1.60), without differences between the risk subgroups. Conclusion: Aspirin was associated with a slight decrease in AMI and ischemic stroke in absolute terms, with no differences in cardiovascular mortality. This accompanied by the increase in hemorrhagic complications, results in an absence of net clinical benefit. The baseline cardiovascular risk of the population did not affect the results.